If I need to go and review something though I can with Sighthound's mobile app. If all goes well, you should see a stream of video from your Macs attached video camera. As SecuritySpy supports a number of cameras, you simply select the camera you want to view and then click View Live Images. The mobile app for Sighthound is coming along, but I find Blue Iris much quicker to just pull up a quick view of what is happening right now. By now, you should be logged in and ready to start watching a live stream of your security camera. I still find its detection while not perfect is far better than I have used in any other program I have tried and it makes looking for things that happened during the day much easier than sifting through hours of footage and if needed the whole day is there as well not just clips. Sizing: The camera strap is adjustable from 32.6 (83cm) to 40 (102cm) Width of the main strap: 1.7 (4.2cm) Width of the smaller straps at the ends: 0.4 (1cm) The inside is well padded, soft and with anti-slip. (United States) and its basic language is English. We haven’t detected security issues or inappropriate content on and thus you can safely use it. Sighthound is harder to track since it spawns off different processes for the cameras, but I would estimate it uses around 12 to 25 percent as well depending on what is happening. It seems that Web Staging Sighthound content is notably popular in USA. At night it is lower since a few cameras don't have IR and have less activity. The machine it is running on currently is a 8 core AMD 8350 and Blue Iris by itself during the day uses around 10 to 20 percent cpu depending on the load. That saves on both packages hitting the cameras at the same time and keeps the bandwidth needed much lower. I use Blue Iris as the "hub" and all the feeds go through it then using localhost Sighthound connects to Blue Iris for all of its feeds. I have them all running on a Windows server 2012 r2 box that also handles nightly backups. I currently have 9 cameras active in different ranges of resolution from around 480 up to 1080. I still like Blue Iris as the web portion seems a bit better and quicker to pull up on all the remote devices we use it on. When I started using Sighthound it was Vitamin D and didn't have any remote viewing options so that's why I used Blue Iris for that portion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |